What best describes the relationship between federal and Michigan court systems?

The relationship between the federal and Michigan court systems is characterized by the concept of judicial review regarding constitutional issues. When a case arises in Michigan state courts, and it raises a federal constitutional issue, that decision can indeed be reviewed by federal courts. This means that if a Michigan court has made a ruling that involves the interpretation of federal law or constitutional rights, an aggrieved party has the right to appeal to a federal court, such as a U.S. District Court or potentially the U.S. Supreme Court, if further appeal is warranted. This aspect underscores the federal courts' key role in maintaining checks and balances regarding constitutional rights and federal law, even within state jurisdictions.

In contrast, options that suggest limitations on federal courts, like stating they only review civil cases or asserting they have absolute power, do not accurately represent the intertwined judicial responsibilities and the constitutional protections provided to individuals across both systems.