What standard is applied to determine the voluntariness of a statement?

The voluntariness standard, often assessed during a Walker Hearing, is the correct choice for determining whether a statement made by an individual is voluntary and therefore admissible in court. This standard evaluates the totality of the circumstances surrounding the statement, including factors like the suspect's mental state, the presence of coercive tactics by law enforcement, and the overall context in which the statement was made.

In legal terms, for a statement to be admissible, it must be given freely and willingly, without any form of duress or undue influence. The Walker Hearing specifically addresses these issues by allowing a judge to determine if a confession or statement should be allowed as evidence based on its voluntary nature.

Other standards mentioned do not specifically relate to the voluntariness of a statement. The Miranda standard pertains to the requirement of advising individuals of their rights before interrogation, whereas the burden of proof standard relates to the obligation to prove a case in court. The good faith standard is often about the intentions behind actions taken by law enforcement, rather than the voluntary nature of statements made by suspects. Hence, the voluntariness standard is pivotal for ensuring that any confession or admission to a crime is both fair and just.